• by throwaway420 on 3/8/2013, 10:30:32 PM

    Anybody who promises to stop deleting and locking interesting questions on Stack Overflow gets my vote.

    Wikipedia has the same problem.

  • by antman on 3/9/2013, 2:36:16 AM

    A moderator that saves me from having to type long queries on google has my vote. I currently have to type: termtosearch site:stackoverflow.com "closed as not".

  • by wfunction on 3/8/2013, 10:46:39 PM

    I'll be looking for moderators who won't close "Why?" questions on the basis that knowing "why" doesn't solve an existing problem.

  • by freework on 3/9/2013, 3:33:27 AM

    Why does an upvote/downvote community need moderators? Isn't the whole point of letting users upvote and downvote content to avoid having moderator overlords?

  • by Encosia on 3/9/2013, 12:29:46 AM

    Should be closed as not a real question and too localized.

  • by rebelde on 3/8/2013, 11:11:18 PM

    A popularity contest to choose moderators? I wouldn't run my forums that way. We would end up with the wrong people in charge.

  • by singular on 3/8/2013, 11:57:01 PM

    I'd vote for moderators who punish people for answering:-

    X. It took me Y seconds to google your problem and find that solution.

    It'd save me downvoting every time I see that kind of ridiculous passive aggressive bullshit.