This is a great idea. I was actually working on something similar yesterday! The beauty of this is that it has so many uses! I think all the haters need to chill and think about this for a minute. Yeah, it's probably a wrapper around webkit2png but outside of HN people...

1. Don't know how to use the terminal

2. Can't install webkit2png themselves (there are a lot of things that can go wrong - just ask me because they all went wrong for me yesterday. Everything from QT4 libs missing to $DISPLAY not being set, to the PIP package not installing correctly, to X-server connection problems)

3. Even if they had webkit2png they wouldn't know how to write a wrapper that took a damn screen shot, then resized it as a thumbnail, and changes the screen size so you can see a preview for multiple devices.

4. Don't have a Linux (or even POSIX compliant) machine locally or hosted somewhere.

This may seem simple here (well, to me it's more intermediate) but outside HN people will probably go nuts over this. Shameless sorta plug: I just started a project yesterday that does a very similar thing except it's meant for designers to take and store screenshots for inspiration and then plop them into a pretty UI/gallery. I'm going to open source it and host it though.

For a single-purpose app like this, at least it could do a better job at rendering the screenshots, if you ask me. I tried it out on my site (no custom web-fonts, pretty standard stuff) and the font-rendering looks awful:

http://cl.ly/image/3S2E3Z3i412n

Is this product trying to compete with free plugin-in's like Screen Capture (by Google), or is it trying to be more of a "live site" preview generator that you see on like inspiration-esq sites or theme seller sites? I don't think that is fully clear in the marketing site.

So, this is a web based API wrapped around webkit2png starting from 9.99 a month?

I wanted to sign up, but the form had autocomplete disabled and you lost me there. What's the incentive for doing that? I never understood it.

This looks great. I've been having one heck of a time trying to get good screenshots lately. It takes up a lot of my time. I'm really interested in your service, but for whatever reason when I punch in a url it won't render a screenshot. It just hangs on the ajax spinner.

Anyone else doesn't get it?

While there appear to be a number of sites operating in this space (documented some here: http://web.onassar.com/blog/2012/11/19/web-based-screenshot-...), this looks simple and straight-forward. While the cost is prohibitive for me since there are free alternatives (http://immediatenet.com/), it's great to see more competition in this space.

For what it's worth, I'm using it on my site http://imnosy.com

This is a good idea, I actaully created something similar using PhantomJS the issue is web fonts there isn't a solution to rendering typekit webfonts using a headless webkit implementation see http://code.google.com/p/phantomjs/issues/detail?id=247 for more details.

As soon as webkit is updated to have better support for OTF fonts urlbox will become so much better

I played around with the sign-up form because I'm designing something similar at the moment. Once I get a "username not valid" error, I can't re-enable the submit-button anymore. You might want to fix that. Also I don't think that the username was already in use, because I entered a random email. Probably a validation error.

To say something positive: I like that the headline changes the last word periodically. That caught my attention.

Interesting question, especially as the Sony/KDE-Icon-thing is such a topic today:

Is this copyright infringement? They use apple.com as an example. The grabbing process clearly doesn't happen on the client side. Even if it did, what would be the implications of using Apples website, logos and trademarks embedded in your content without user interaction?

Thanks to URLBox, Implemented on my URL Shortner http://xgd.in/

Checkout - http://xgd.in/viewdnsinfo+

Note: I am removing it, since it does not work when a person is not logged into the system - its a shame and a sham

What makes these screenshots "gorgeous" or "beautiful"? They look like pretty standard screenshots to me.

Seems to not be working in Opera 12.14. Cant see any screenshots. Anyone else with same problem?

You may need to install some unicode fonts.

Try a url like http://renren.com and it only has certain characters.

Here is an example of multiple screenshots rendered on same page.

https://urlbox.io/demo

No flash plugin.

That was a hard to solve problem for me I would love to pay for. What they are offering does not look competitive.

The webpage does not work in Opera. The top image with search is missing and the bottom ones are just empty image tags.

That thing where it says "web font support" apparently means the opposite, I'm afraid.

Is this running on phantomJS? Looks like webfonts aren't supported.

This seems pretty handy

Why?