• by tangue on 10/14/2012, 9:06:22 AM

    It's pleasant to the eyes but :

    - "Free" is not the kind of license I trust (there's a guy talking about his stealed code on HN this sunday, just check)

    - Not responsive ? Come on we're in 2012

    - It would be better if it was hosted on github (or bitbucket). So everyone could improve it (but again what's the license ?) There's a lot of competition in this field and at this stage I don't see any valid reason to use this one, rather than say Bootstrap, Foundation or Skeleton.

  • by lukifer on 10/14/2012, 8:50:06 AM

    I love the aesthetic and the semantics. Nice job!

    However, I'm not seeing any responsiveness to the grid; it renders the same when I resize the browser or view in mobile.

  • by wheaties on 10/14/2012, 12:26:26 PM

    Nice but Zurb does this and so much more.

  • by joycer on 10/16/2012, 10:36:30 PM

    This is great. These frameworks usually have a .css and a .min.css file.

    I would love to see one that has a .verbose.css where all possible attributes or properties are listed and commented out in the brackets for that element. As a reference or resource to grab a chunk from for your own .css file.

  • by eberfreitas on 10/14/2012, 1:42:22 PM

    I would love if there was a project like "bootstriped", where I would get all the classes but with minimal styling, with just a visual hint of what they should look like. I could very easily adapt them to my own needs and designs. Does that sounds like a good idea? I might actually do it (or not).

  • by dstarh1976 on 10/14/2012, 11:39:42 AM

    It seems like bootstrap with less features

  • by hobonumber1 on 10/14/2012, 8:50:23 AM

    Nice work - it's always good to see new CSS frameworks coming out

  • by chovy on 10/14/2012, 7:16:44 AM

    hey, this may be exactly what i was looking for. thanks