So much hyperbole. Some good nuggets in the article but it would be better if the author took one of his allegations and went deep on it, instead of trying to whip the reader into a froth with a slew of nebulous claims that are never fully substantiated.

They all admit they don't understand how their models actually work, yet they want us to trust them with everything.

Then I realized what's really happening is they're racing for the biggest corporate prize in history...a potential $50 trillion valuation.

Are they playing us?