by jll29 on 4/30/2025, 8:41:47 PM
by Terr_ on 4/30/2025, 8:25:26 PM
> Windows Server 2025
Over on the consumer side, I'd rather pay $1.50 to permanently regain full control over when the computer I own reboots for updates.
(Yes yes, insert Use Linux Joke here.)
by greyadept on 4/30/2025, 9:54:34 PM
I would hate to be the Microsoft account manager having to explain this fee to a CIO. Especially when Linux kernel livepatch is free.
by brutal_chaos_ on 4/30/2025, 11:04:07 PM
Get ready to see a lot more hotfixes...
by peltoche on 5/2/2025, 7:10:03 AM
Serious question: what windows does/does better than Linux that can explain be ready to pay for using their server softwares?
by mystified5016 on 5/1/2025, 3:57:50 PM
Pretty ballsy for Microsoft to charge a subscription fee for a feature that Linux has had for decades.
I don't expect this to go well for them.
by a_void_sky on 5/1/2025, 8:34:43 AM
incentivizing themselves for building a broken system, you can do anything if you have a majority of market share
by euroderf on 4/30/2025, 10:18:03 PM
Chiselers.
by supportengineer on 4/30/2025, 11:40:32 PM
Obligatory "I'm gonna write myself a new minivan this afternoon"
This is genious, whoever came up with it!
Imagine doing that in pharma also: you pay a regular monthly fee for the side effects of the medical drugs you took (caused by the pharma company, not by you).