• by ggm on 3/25/2025, 11:01:20 PM

    the x-browser-validation string value being identical for all users tends to suggest it's value is low to none. It feels like a misunderstanding of need and outcome. If its a super-encoded version string, well and good. It might be constructed over a shared secret and encode bitflags to capability or something but it looks like junk science or a misnamed field.

    The copyright thing, there are different opinions about the need to assert (C) and it's existence. If you were about to go into lawfare with e.g. Brave, then evidence of assertion would probably help when you came close to the steps of the court.

    it's not even immediately clear what they assert copyright over. The body of text sent as the HTTP header? Are they claiming intellectual property rights in the SPECIFIC set of type:values, or the value part only, or the type part only?