Default musl allocator considered harmful (to performance)
by vkaku on 3/6/2025, 6:01:04 AM
I opened up this discussion to help people figure out solutions to this problem.
I was reading this thread on Bun's Musl based binaries, which can work on most distributions: https://x.com/braincode/status/1897228222695424100 when I saw a link to this problem.
What can people to do for a better musl - assuming other programs take the static link approach?
I opened up this discussion to help people figure out solutions to this problem.
I was reading this thread on Bun's Musl based binaries, which can work on most distributions: https://x.com/braincode/status/1897228222695424100 when I saw a link to this problem.
What can people to do for a better musl - assuming other programs take the static link approach?