• by solardev on 9/4/2024, 8:41:57 PM

    None of the SMBs I've worked with would want to self-host something like that. It's too business-critical yet not core enough to warrant that sort of engineer time in regards to setup, maintenance, security, etc. They'll usually mix and match hosted services like ClickUp, Airtable, Sprout, HubSpot, ActiveCampaign, etc. along with whatever in-house or domain-specific things they use.

    It's like asking them to self-develop LibreOffice and GIMP instead of just using MS Office and Adobe. High risk, high cost (in time), and pretty much no advantage over a reasonable SaaS price that's usually in the tens to hundreds of dollars a month.

    -------

    On the other hand, you can always do a hybrid model where the software (or just its core features) are open source, but you offer a hosted cloud version for most users and only offer enterprise/compliance people the self-hosted version for mucho $$$. That's how Atlassian used to do it.

  • by nullindividual on 9/3/2024, 6:10:21 PM

    Why would SMB care about open source in the solution they choose? SMBs are the least likely to self-host given the costs of hosting. They will go for SaaS (or otherwise MSP-managed services, which often resell SaaS) where possible.