>Our internal security team immediately launched an investigation to help determine what the aim of the attack was,

To steal people's crypto?

I'm mostly surprised by the number of subscribers

> The threat actor exported the blog mailing list email addresses, which was a total of 3759 email addresses.

3700 addresses doesn't seem like that much at all.

It doesn't seem to say how the mailing list was hacked and why we shouldn't be concerned about their overall security practices.

Off the cuff thought, but I wonder if the early days of modern banking were marred with such blatant fraud and deceit.

I think of stage coach robberies of US bonds, and the various bank “rug-pulls” (to use crypto fraud nomenclature) that occurred before the Coinage act of 1857 - but it’s such distant history it’s hard to find how people felt about it at the time.

What I’m getting at is this - is crypto fraud innate to it’s very essence, or did all “advancements” in banking technology have the same problem before everyone settled in and “got used” to attempts at fraud.

What I take from reading this, is that only 35k folks are interested in Ethereum.