If you skip all the math and programs, you'll get to this part:
>> These results of 1-bit PRVHASH say the following: if abstract mathematics contains not just a system of rules for manipulating numbers, but also a freely-defined fixed information that is also "readable" by a person, then mathematics does not just "exist", but "it was formed", because mathematics does not evolve (beside human discovery of new rules and patterns). And since physics cannot be formulated without such mathematics, and physical processes clearly obey these mathematical rules, it means that a Creator/Higher Intelligence/God exists in relation to the Universe. For the author personally, everything is proven here.
I truly don't understand how the author can come to that conclusion because the assumptions are not correct. Specifically this:
> since physics cannot be formulated without such mathematics, and physical processes clearly obey these mathematical rules
The "clearly" is doing a LOT of work here.
All of this reminds me of Stephen Wolfram's claims.
If you skip all the math and programs, you'll get to this part:
>> These results of 1-bit PRVHASH say the following: if abstract mathematics contains not just a system of rules for manipulating numbers, but also a freely-defined fixed information that is also "readable" by a person, then mathematics does not just "exist", but "it was formed", because mathematics does not evolve (beside human discovery of new rules and patterns). And since physics cannot be formulated without such mathematics, and physical processes clearly obey these mathematical rules, it means that a Creator/Higher Intelligence/God exists in relation to the Universe. For the author personally, everything is proven here.
I truly don't understand how the author can come to that conclusion because the assumptions are not correct. Specifically this:
> since physics cannot be formulated without such mathematics, and physical processes clearly obey these mathematical rules
The "clearly" is doing a LOT of work here.
All of this reminds me of Stephen Wolfram's claims.