One good positive effect of this (in my opinion pretty unconstitutional) move is that the state will be considered de facto responsible for any negative effect of vaccination.
I mean: now, when you take your jab, you sign a paper where you acknowledge the risk: it is your 'free' choice, and you get the consequences.
Btw: there is still no penalty for not obeying this new rule (they are talking about 100€)
I personally suspect that all this persistence on having the whole population vaccinated hide some other reason: this is Italy, where you still have the Mafia controlling vast areas, where you can die in an airplane crash explosion and still do not know after decades the reason (just to mention a few).
Could it be that having a relevant number of non vaccinated population could make it easier in the future to study the consequences of the vax in the long run?
Plus:
* why we still do not know the reason why in many African countries the number of infection is pretty modest (Nigeria, for example)
* why we still not know much about correlation of infection with other factors which may help preventing it: for example: having a beard helps or not? and biting your fingernails does it makes it worse? wearing glasses? ... My thesis was on PPA, I am aware you can pretty easy get significant factors... you just need good data (so the will to collect it)
One good positive effect of this (in my opinion pretty unconstitutional) move is that the state will be considered de facto responsible for any negative effect of vaccination.
I mean: now, when you take your jab, you sign a paper where you acknowledge the risk: it is your 'free' choice, and you get the consequences.
Btw: there is still no penalty for not obeying this new rule (they are talking about 100€)
I personally suspect that all this persistence on having the whole population vaccinated hide some other reason: this is Italy, where you still have the Mafia controlling vast areas, where you can die in an airplane crash explosion and still do not know after decades the reason (just to mention a few).
Could it be that having a relevant number of non vaccinated population could make it easier in the future to study the consequences of the vax in the long run?
Plus: * why we still do not know the reason why in many African countries the number of infection is pretty modest (Nigeria, for example) * why we still not know much about correlation of infection with other factors which may help preventing it: for example: having a beard helps or not? and biting your fingernails does it makes it worse? wearing glasses? ... My thesis was on PPA, I am aware you can pretty easy get significant factors... you just need good data (so the will to collect it)