by daveloyall on 3/21/2016, 9:05:49 PM
by rndmize on 3/21/2016, 9:12:37 PM
Wasn't able to read the article since it was paywalled, but I'd guess this Economist piece is on the same matter: http://www.economist.com/news/international/21693922-organis...
by dtf on 3/21/2016, 10:09:41 PM
"The Internet as we know it won’t survive if other governments get their way."
Here's a quick recap from TechDirt on the kind of Internet the author of this article would prefer:
by alricb on 3/21/2016, 9:47:28 PM
by wcummings on 3/21/2016, 8:53:40 PM
>It’s up to Congress to block a surrender that could give control to authoritarian rulers.
Oh, the irony!
by dev1n on 3/21/2016, 8:38:02 PM
google link to bypass paywall [1]
[1]:https://www.google.com/#q=http:%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%...
I don't really follow ICANN news. I have some vague idea that they've made some questionable moves over the past several years.
I know nothing of the Obama administration's involvement.
Could somebody translate the article into a form I understand? ICANN manages the sale/assignment of IP addresses and manages the Root DNS Servers, right?
How does USA currently control them and what does the proposed change mean?